Chapter 2 Using functions

2.1 Introduction

Functions are an essential building block of any programming language. The job of a function is to carry out a calculation or computation that would typically require many lines code to do ‘from scratch’. Functions allow us to reuse common computations while offering some control over the precise details of what happens. To use R effectively—even if our needs are very simple—we need to understand how to use functions. This chapter aims to explain what functions are for, how to use them, and how to avoid mistakes when doing so, without getting lost in the detail of how they work.

2.2 Functions and arguments

Functions allow us to reuse a calculation. The best way to see what we mean by this is to see one in action. The round function rounds numbers to a significant number of digits (no surprises there). To use it, we could type this into the Console and hit Enter:

round(x = 3.141593, digits = 2)

We have suppressed the output so that we can unpack things a bit first. We rely on the same basic construct every time we use a function. This starts with the name of the function as the prefix. In the example above, the function name is round. After the function name, we need a pair of opening and closing parentheses. This combination of name and parentheses alerts R to fact that we are using a function.

What about the bits inside the parentheses? These are called the arguments of the function. That’s a horrible name, but it is the one that everyone uses, so we have to get used to it. Depending on how it was defined, a function can take zero, one, or more arguments. We will discuss this idea in more detail later in this section. In simple terms, the arguments control the behaviour of a function.

We used the round function with two arguments. We supplied each one as a name-value pair separated by a comma. When working with arguments, name-value pairs occur either side of the equals sign (=), with the argument name on the left-hand side and its value on the right-hand side. The name serves to identify which argument we are working with, and the value is the thing that controls what that argument does.

We call the process of associating argument names and values ‘setting the arguments’ of the function (or ‘supplying the arguments’). Notice the similarity between supplying function arguments and the assignment operation discussed in the last topic. The difference is that name-value pairs are associated with the = symbol when involved in arguments.

Use = to assign arguments

Do not use the assignment operator <- inside the parentheses when working with functions. This is a “trust us” situation—you will end up in all kinds of difficulty if you do this!

The arguments control the behaviour of a function. Our job as users is to set the values of these to get the behaviour we want. However, The function determines arguments we are allowed to use, i.e. we are not free to choose whatever name we like3.

round(x = 3.141593, digits = 2)
## [1] 3.14

The round function rounds one or more numeric inputs and rounds these to a particular number of significant digits. The argument that specifies the number(s) to round is x; the second argument, digits, specifies the number of decimal places we require. Based on the supplied values of these arguments, 3.141593 and 2, respectively, the round function spits out a value of 3.14, which is then printed to the Console.

What if we had wanted to the answer to 3 significant digits? We would set the digits argument to 3:

round(x = 3.141593, digits = 3)
## [1] 3.142

This illustrates what we mean when we say arguments control the behaviour of the function—digits sets the number of significant digits calculated by round.

2.3 Evaluating arguments and returning results

Whenever R evaluates a function, we refer to this action as ‘calling the function’. In our simple example, we called the round function with arguments x and digits. That said, we often just say ‘use the function’ because that is more natural to most users.

Several things happen when we call functions: first they evaluate their arguments, then they perform some action, and finally (optionally) return a value to us. Let’s work through what all that means…

What do we mean by the word ‘evaluate’? When we call a function, what typically happens is:

  1. the R expression on the right-hand side of an = is evaluated,
  2. the result is associated with the corresponding argument name, and
  3. the function does its calculations using the resulting name-value pairs.

To see how the evaluation step works, take a look at a new example using round:

round(x = 2.3 + 1.4, digits = 0)
## [1] 4

What happened above is that R evaluated 2.3 + 1.4, resulting in the number 3.7, which was then associated with the argument x. We set digits to 0 this time so that round returns a whole number, 4.

The important thing to realise is that the expression(s) on the right-hand side of the = can be anything we like. This third example essentially equivalent to the last one:

y <- 2.3 + 1.4
round(x = y, digits = 0)
## [1] 4

This time we created a new variable called y and supplied this as the value of the x argument. When we use the round function like this, the R interpreter spots that something on the right-hand side of an = is a variable and associates the value of this variable with x argument. As long as we have defined the numeric variable y at some point we can use it as the value of an argument.

At the beginning of this section, we said that a function may optionally return a value to us when it completes its task. That word ‘return’ refers to the process by which a function outputs a value. If we use a function at the Console the returned value is printed out. However, we can use this value in other ways. For example, there is nothing to stop us combining function calls with the arithmetic operations:

2 * round(x = 2.64, digits = 0)
## [1] 6

Here the R interpreter evaluates the function call and then multiplies the value it returns by 2. If we want to reuse this value, we have to assign the result of function call, for example:

roundnum <- 2 * round(x = 2.64, digits = 0)

Using a function with <- is no different from the examples using multiple arithmetic operations in the last topic. The R interpreter starts on the right-hand side of the <-, evaluates the function call there, and only then assigns the value to roundnum.

Argument names vs variable names

Keeping in mind what we’ve just learned, take a careful look at this example:

x <- 0
round(x = 3.7, digits = x)
## [1] 4

What is going on here? The key to understanding this is to realise that the symbol x is used in two different ways here. When it appears on the left-hand side of the = it represents an argument name. When it appears on the right-hand side, it is treated as a variable name, which must have a value associated with it for the above to be valid. That is a confusing way to use the round function, but it is perfectly valid.

The message here is that what matters is where things appear relative to the =, not the symbols used to represent them.

2.4 Specifying function arguments

So far, we have been concentrating on functions that carry out mathematical calculations with numbers. Functions can do all kinds of things. For example, some functions are designed to extract information about other functions. Take a look at the args function:

args(name = round)
## function (x, digits = 0) 
## NULL

args prints a summary of the main arguments of a function. What can we learn from the summary of the arguments of round? Notice that the first one, x, is shown without an associated value, whereas the digits part of the summary is printed as digits = 0.

The significance of this is that digits has a default value (0 in this case). This means that we can leave out digits when using the round function:

round(x = 3.7)
## [1] 4

This is the same result as we would get using round(x = 3.7, digits = 0). This ‘default value’ behaviour is useful because it allows us keep our R code concise. Some functions take a large number of arguments, many of which are defined with sensible defaults. Unless we need to change these default arguments, we can ignore them when we call such functions.

Notice that the x argument of round does not have a default, which means we have to supply a value. This is sensible, as the whole purpose of round is to round any number we give it.

There is another way to simplify our use of functions. Take a look at this example:

round(3.72, digits = 1)
## [1] 3.7

What does this demonstrate? We do not have to specify argument names. In the absence of a name R uses the position of the supplied argument to work out which name to associate it with. In this example we left out the name of the argument at position 1. This is where x belongs, so we end up rounding 3.71 to 1 decimal place.

R is even more flexible than this. We don’t necessarily have to use the full name of an argument, because R can use partial matching on argument names:

round(3.72, dig = 1)
## [1] 3.7

This also works because R can unambiguously match the argument we named dig to digits.

Be careful with your arguments

Here is some advice. Do not rely on partial matching of function names. It just leads to confusion and the odd error. If you use it a lot, you end up forgetting the true name of arguments, and if you abbreviate too much, you create name matching conflicts. For example, if a function has arguments arg1 and arg2 and you use the partial name a for an argument, there is no way to know which argument you meant. We are pointing out partial matching so that you are aware of the behaviour. It is not worth the hassle of getting it wrong to save on a little typing, so do not use it.

What about position matching? This can also cause problems if we’re not paying attention. For example, if you forget the order of the arguments to a function and then place your arguments in the wrong place, you will either generate an error or produce a nonsensical result. It is nice not to have to type out the name = value construct all the time though, so our advice is to rely on positional matching only for the first argument. This is a common convention in R that makes sense because it is often obvious what kind of information the first argument should carry.

2.5 Combining functions

Using R to do ‘real work’ usually involves linked steps, each facilitated by a different function. There is more than one way to achieve this. Here’s a simple example that uses an approach we already know about—storing intermediate results:

y <- sqrt(10)
round(y, digits = 1)
## [1] 3.2

These two lines calculate the square root of the number 10 and assigned the result to y, then round this to one decimal place and print the result. We linked the two calculations by assigning a name to the first result and then used this as the input to a function in the second step.

Here is another way to replicate the same calculation:

round(sqrt(10), digits = 1)
## [1] 3.2

The technical name for this is function composition or function nesting: the sqrt function is ‘nested inside’ the round function. The way we have to read these constructs is from the inside out. The sqrt(10) expression is inside the round function, so this is evaluated first. The result of sqrt(10) is then associated with the first argument of the round function, and only then does the round function do its job.

There aren’t any new ideas here. We have already seen that R evaluates whatever is on the right-hand side of the = symbol first before associating the resulting value with the appropriate argument name.

We can extend this nesting idea to do more complicated calculations, i.e. there’s nothing to stop us using multiple levels of nesting either. Take a look at this example:

round(sqrt(abs(-10)), digits = 1)
## [1] 3.2

The abs function takes the absolute value of a number, i.e. removes the - sign if it is there. Remember, read nested calls from the inside out:

  1. we find the absolute value of -10,
  2. we calculate the square root of the resulting number (+10), and
  3. then we rounded this to a whole number.

Nested function calls can be useful because they make R code less verbose (we write less), but this comes at a high cost of reduced readability. No reasonable person would say that round(sqrt(abs(-10)), digits = 1) is easy to read! For this reason, we aim to keep function nesting to a minimum. We will occasionally have to use the nesting construct, so it is important to understand how it works even if we don’t like it.

The good news is that we’ll see a much-easier-to-read method for applying a series of functions in the Data Wrangling block.

2.6 Functions do not have ‘side effects’

We’ll finish this chapter with an idea every R user needs to understand to avoid confusion. It relates to how functions modify their arguments, or more accurately, how they do not modify their arguments. Take a look at this example:

y <- 3.7
round(y, digits = 0)
## [1] 4
y
## [1] 3.7

We created a variable y with the value 3.7, rounded this to a whole number with round, printed out the result, and then printed the value of y. Notice that the value of y has not changed after using it as an argument to round.

This is important. R functions do not typically alter the values of their arguments (we say ‘typically’ because there are ways to alter this behaviour if we really want to). This behaviour is captured by the phrase ‘functions do not have side effects’.

If we had intended to round the value of y so that we can use this new value later on, we have to assign the result of function evaluation, like this:

y <- 3.7
y <- round(y, digits = 0)

The reason for pointing out this behaviour is because new R users sometimes assume a function will change its arguments. R functions do not typically do this. If we want to make use of changes, rather than print them to the Console, we need to assign the result a name, either by creating a new variable or overwriting the old one. Remember—functions do not have side effects! Forgetting this creates all kinds of headaches.


  1. We say “typically”, because R is a very flexible language and so there are certain exceptions to this simple rule of thumb. For now it is simpler to think of the names as constrained by the particular function we’re using. Let’s return to th example to see how all this works:↩︎